|
Air Today . . . Gone Tomorrow Article I City Struggles to
Contend with Widespread WTC Cough
By Laurie Garrett, Newsday Staff
Writer, September 30, 2002
First of two stories
Physicians in the city have made it clear: The malady now officially called World Trade
Center cough is like nothing they've ever seen, and hundreds - perhaps thousands - of
people are experiencing it. The extent of this lung disease is not known, and for a
combination of bureaucratic reasons, the extent of the human health impact may be
understated. Moreover, cleanup efforts may be inappropriately focused on a single element
of the debris: asbestos.
The ailment, as described recently by Dr. Kerry Kelly, the New York Fire Department's
chief medical officer, is characterized by a reduced lung capacity and a hyper-reactivity
of the airways to inhaled particles, bacteria and viruses. The cough is dry and
nonproductive and can leave the sufferer gasping for air.
As physicians sought to pin down the ailment's causes, the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency was monitoring Ground Zero and lower Manhattan for chemicals and substances that
violate the Clean Air Act. It has become clear, though, that the cough's causes have
little if anything to do with those substances. Rather, the culprit appears to be
microscopic bits of glass. Satellite images shot by NASA throughout Sept. 11, 2001, depict
the plume of dust, toxins and debris drifting directly from Ground Zero southeastward,
blanketing a portion of Brooklyn. Hospitals there have reported increases in respiratory
complaints.
In Brooklyn Heights, Dr. Tucker Woods was running the emergency room of Long Island
College Hospital on Sept. 11 when, he recalls, the staff handled a "huge influx"
of respiratory cases. "And I personally this year have seen a real increase in asthma
complaints and chronic bronchitis," Woods said. "It's World Trade Center cough;
absolutely new cases. And it's also a worsening of old, chronic respiratory cases."
Even mild forms of the cough can severely aggravate existing conditions. Anne, 33, a
Broadway actress who asked that her last name not be used for fear of endangering her
roles in musical theater, was home in Park Slope on Sept. 11. Three years ago, she was
diagnosed with a mild case of asthma, which, she said, had been controlled with the
aerosol medication albuterol.
On the morning after the terrorist attack, she awoke "feeling my chest was tight,
sort of heavy. So I stood up to cross the room and get my albuterol, and I passed
out." She hobbled to her neighborhood emergency room for treatment to clear her air
passages. In November, she found herself gasping for air when she contracted the flu. At
New York Methodist Hospital, the otherwise healthy actress required several hours'
treatment to restore normal breathing.
In its more extreme form, WTC cough has debilitated otherwise healthy men and women,
according to physicians who have treated them. Like sea anemones that ball up when
touched, the airways of these patients recoil from microscopic foreign objects and
constrict. It is possible, Kelly and other physicians said, that these people are
permanently injured and will suffer more respiratory problems.
At the Sept. 9 New York Academy of Medicine conference, where authorities confirmed the
cough's existence, Mount Sinai School of Medicine occupational health specialist Dr.
Steven Levin said he has treated more than 1,000 people who worked in the Ground Zero area
last fall. "It is our impression that many have developed inflammatory responses, and
that not so many are really fully well," Levin said. "I have very few patients
who in fact have returned to pre-9/11 levels of lung function."
Levin's clinic has identified sinusitis, laryngitis and new-onset asthma in the workers,
in addition to the extreme World Trade Center cough. "What you have downwind [in
southeastern Manhattan and Brooklyn] are people with variable susceptibility. And we can't
predict who the susceptibles will be," Levin said in an interview. It is predictable,
he argued, that vulnerable people - workers, residents and commuters - who inhaled Ground
Zero air last fall will suffer health problems.
The New York City Department of Health has found little in its air and home sampling to
explain the syndrome, Assistant Commissioner of Health Dr. Jessica Leighton said. Only 1
percent of sample sites in lower Manhattan were "above EPA standards" for
asbestos or other legally controlled air pollutants.
Indeed, EPA spokeswoman Bonnie Bellow said even in the hours after the Twin Towers
collapsed, New York City air "did not exceed national air-quality standards." On
only one late September day did the city's air appear unhealthy, according to the EPA's
legal criteria. "That's not at all to suggest there wasn't a huge amount of
dust," added Mary Mears, another EPA spokeswoman.
That may be the point, according to scientists: The chemicals or asbestos for which air is
tested may not be to blame. Environmental health expert Lung Chi Chen of the New York
University School of Medicine is a member of a team analyzing dust, debris and air samples
collected last fall. Chen agrees with the EPA that there was very little asbestos in the
debris; indeed, the city Department of Health stopped asbestos installation in the very
earliest stages of trade center construction. However, the clouds contained microscopic
shards of glass, much of it coated with contaminants such as soot, bacteria, mold and
human cells. Additionally, pulverized concrete was highly alkaline or rife with metallic
elements.
Normally, the human lung tends to be an acidic environment, with a pH of around 5 to 7.
The debris on Sept. 11 had a pH ranging from 9.2 to 11.5. Even a hyperventilating
individual suffering from severe anxiety, the normal cause of alkalosis of the lung,
rarely runs a pH of higher than 7.7.
The human lung has a mechanism called the "mucous escalator," in which
irritating particles trigger a response called complement, which releases large amounts of
mucous. The mucous surrounds the troubling particles, which are then coughed up. In
response to extreme pH, coupled with glass and other irritants, airways constrict and the
mucous that usually encases toxins and allows them to be expelled isn't effective. A dry,
nonproductive cough is the result.
Dr. Sonia Buist of Oregon Health Sciences University in Portland, Ore., has studied the
impact of the 1981 eruption of Mount St. Helens on the lungs of Oregon loggers who worked
seasonally in the area in the next five years. The ash they inhaled, like the World Trade
Center debris, was high in ground glass. They experienced lung irritation, and symptoms
varied according to the content of the ash breathed, Buist said. Most were restored to
full health because the particles were cleared from their lungs.
The Mount St. Helens analogy has its limitations, however. Volcanos produce very acidic,
not alkaline, material. Further, Buist found that glass fibers coated with contaminants,
as in World Trade Center debris, were harder to clear from the lungs. Dr. Marc Wilkenfeld
of the Columbia University Health Sciences Division said he believes the WTC debris was
"frankly corrosive" and may have damaged human lung cells in a more direct
fashion. He noted that a U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention study of city
firefighters found that most WTC cough victims also suffered gastrointestinal tract
irritation, the result of swallowing airborne debris. That finding, he argued, is a sign
of corrosive damage to the gastrointestinal tract.
All of this puts health officials in a tough position. Within days of Sept. 11, EPA
Director Christie Whitman said the city's air was safe - a position a spokesman later
clarified to mean that the air did not contain dangerous levels of asbestos or other
normally tested toxins. The EPA has maintained that position, and all testing and cleanup
operations have focused on a small part of Manhattan, below Canal Street, and a short list
of substances, chiefly asbestos.
If testing this fall in lower Manhattan shows "there is anything to indicate we
should go outside that area," Bellow said, then residents from other parts of the
city who place their names on an EPA list before Oct. 3 may be notified. Residents outside
that zone can call 877-796-5471.
So far, no residents above Canal Street or in Brooklyn have been ruled eligible for such
federal services as apartment cleaning as a result of residential or occupational
exposure, Columbia's Wilkenfeld said. Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-Manhattan), who has
criticized the EPA's response to air-quality concerns, said the agency's focus on lower
Manhattan is "entirely, completely arbitrary. There's no scientific basis to
it."
Nadler said starting last fall, he asked the EPA to expand its testing so the area of
focus could be based on scientific criteria. "In January, I said, 'Get a satellite
photo. See where the plume went.' And the EPA said, 'There are no satellite photos,'"
Nadler said in an interview. "And when I saw the NASA photos in Newsday [Aug. 23], I
was livid, because I was lied to." "That is not true," the EPA's Bellow
said. "He was not told that. We would have no reason to tell the congressman that
they didn't exist when they did."
http://www.nyc.gov/html/doh/html/wtc/index.html
FAIR USE NOTICE
This article contains copyrighted material, the use of which has not always been
specifically authorized by the copyright owner. I am making such material
available in my efforts to advance understanding of democracy, economic,
environmental, human rights, political, scientific, and social justice issues,
among others. I believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted
material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance
with Title 17 U.S.C. Section
107, the material in this article is distributed without profit for research
and educational purposes. Take me back to learn more |
|
|