|
Air Today . . . Gone Tomorrow Article
EPA Sets Voluntary Participation for Trade
Center Toxin Search
By David M Levitt, Bloomberg News, May 24, 2005 (New York)
May 24 (Bloomberg) -- The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency won't require New
York property owners to cooperate with its search for toxic dust from the
destruction of the World Trade Center, officials said.
The agency rejected calls to make participation in the inspections mandatory as
it plans its second examination of the disaster's long-term environmental
impacts, said Jacky Rosati, an EPA researcher, speaking at a hearing in lower
Manhattan.
Evidence of trade center-related contamination, such as asbestos and lead, could
trigger a new government-financed cleanup of apartments and workplaces in lower
Manhattan and Brooklyn. People living near Ground Zero complain of elevated
levels of asthma and other respiratory ailments that they attribute to residue
from the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attack.
"We're not going to bully people into offering up their units and apartments for
any purpose," said Timothy Oppelt, interim chairman of the EPA's trade center
technical review.
The plan calls for voluntary inspections of 150 buildings and for indoor areas
deemed inaccessible, such as under beds and behind copying machines, to have
different thresholds for cleanup than highly trafficked walkways and exterior
surfaces.
Residents and environmental activists assailed the EPA, saying the decisions
attempt to minimize the extent of contamination. Linda Rosenthal, an aide to
U.S. Representative Jerrold Nadler, a Manhattan Democrat, said federal law
empowers the agency "to enter any vessel, facility or property, to conduct
responsible testing and cleanup.''
Access
"The EPA gains access to sites all over the country all the time," she said.
"Lower Manhattan should not be an exception.''
The agency plans a "spatially balanced statistical selection of 150 buildings''
from among 6,000-plus structures ranging from Ground Zero to downwind Brooklyn,
said Matthew Lorber of the EPA's National Center for Environmental Assessment.
If a landlord refuses access, the inspection will shift to a statistically
equivalent building, Lorber said.
The program follows a cleanup in 2002 and 2003, in which the U.S. government
paid professionals to remove contaminants from 4,300 apartments close to Ground
Zero.
Oppelt, who is director of the EPA's National Homeland Security Research Center,
said the agency responded to community criticism by doubling the size of the
study area and adding Brooklyn, after initially planning to test only below
Canal Street in lower Manhattan.
The agency, which had planned to test only for asbestos, will also search for
insulation fibers known as "slag wool," polychlorinated aromatic hydrocarbons
and lead, Oppelt said.
Concessions
Still, opponents pressed for more concessions, such as more attention to limited
and inaccessible areas.
"My young children hide under the bed during hide and seek sessions," said Craig
Hall, a resident of Battery Park City and president of the WTC Residents
Coalition. "I open my windows and dust that has collected in the window wells is
blown into our living space. Why are these classified as inaccessible?''
The danger from inhaling trade center pollutants comes from routine exposure,
Lorber said, not from a one-time or occasional encounter.
"Not everyone is going to agree with us 100 percent, but what we have tried to
do is to have an overlapping confluence between what the community wants and
what is scientifically credible and valid," said Michael Brown, an EPA
spokesman.
For details about the Environmental Protection Agency's study of pollution in
Lower Manhattan and Technical Expert Review Panel, see http://www.epa.gov/wtc
To contact the reporter on this story: David M Levitt in New York at (1) (212)
893-4765 or dlevitt@bloomberg.net.
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Edward Demarco at (1) (202)
624-1935 or edemarco1@bloomberg.net.
FAIR USE NOTICE
This article contains copyrighted material, the use of which has not always been
specifically authorized by the copyright owner. I am making such material available in my
efforts to advance understanding of democracy, economic, environmental, human rights,
political, scientific, and social justice issues, among others. I believe this constitutes
a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US
Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107,
the material in this article is distributed without profit for research and educational
purposes.
Take me back to learn more |
|
|