Air Today . . . Gone Tomorrow Article
Critics knock E.P.A.’s new testing plan
By Ronda Kaysen, Downtown Express, Volume 17, Number 51 | May 13 - 19,
The Environmental Protection Agency has released a plan to sample buildings for
remaining World Trade Center disaster dust, however many local residents and
community leaders insist this testing will produce inadequate results.
The near final sampling plan, released on Tuesday, will sample 150 buildings in
Manhattan and Brooklyn in the hopes of determining the extent – if any – of the
remaining contamination from the toxic plume that followed the collapse of the
W.T.C. The results will determine if individual units or whole buildings should
be cleaned and if a wider sampling and cleanup effort is in order.
Although critics laud the plan as a step in the right direction, they worry its
methods may not find the dust that is there.
“The public needs an effective program to test and the current program gives
false assurances,” said Catherine McVay Hughes, community liaison for the E.P.A.
Expert Technical Review Panel, which was established in March 2004 to devise a
sampling and cleaning plan.
The plan will decide the extent of the contamination of a particular building
based on the median – or midpoint – of the contamination levels, a strategy that
has many critics concerned.
“That would water down any contamination results that are found,” said Linda
Rosenthal, an aide to U.S. Rep. Jerrold Nadler who worked with Senator Hillary
Clinton to establish the E.P.A. panel. “The point isn’t not to find
[contamination], the point is to have the most rigorous plan that will find it
in order to protect the people.”
Nadler is concerned because buildings with contaminated samples will still be
considered clean if the number of toxic samples is low.
The E.P.A., however, insists their strategy follows a tried and true scientific
method and is consistent with other contamination programs they have conducted.
“We use these kinds of approaches to inform our decisions,” said Tim Oppelt,
interim E.P.A. panel chairperson. “There’s clearly a difference between finding
a sample in one place and then leaping to the conclusion that the whole building
must be contaminated.”
Because the sampling program is voluntary, critics worry it will exclude many
office workers and commercial and residential tenants who would like to see
their homes and workplaces sampled. “If you’re a worker, you’re at the mercy of
your employer or your landlord to let you come in and check your space,” said
“From the beginning, it has been the intent of the E.P.A. that it would be a
voluntary situation,” said Oppelt.
However, buildings deemed desirable for sampling — based on their proximity to
the site, for example — will be courted by the agency. The selection process
itself may take as long as four or five months to complete.
The sampling plan will search for a W.T.C. “signature” in the dust that is
unique from other forms of New York City dust. Already, E.P.A. scientists are
working to identify the signature. If a signature is not determined, or if it is
not found in the sampled buildings, a cleanup will be unlikely.
“At that point we’re stuck,” Oppelt said. “We don’t have a reliable method
beyond visible dust. There’s really not [another] a reliable way to determine
the extent of the contamination.”
He is confident, however, that researchers will find a viable signature.
“There’s a fair level of enthusiasm that it will work,” he said.
Not everyone is in agreement that a signature will be found in the pockets of
dust hidden throughout the city, and with such a heavy reliance placed on
finding a signature, the E.P.A.’s critics are anxious.
“From my read of the plan, there’s no validation for a signature, nor do I
expect one and therefore we need a plan B,” said Dave Newman, an industrial
hygienist with the New York Committee for Occupational Safety and Health. “What
if there’s no valid signature? What do we do then?”
In the 14 months since the panel was created, not one apartment has been checked
for contaminants. Oppelt hopes with the sampling plan in its final stages, a
consensus can be reached and the sampling can begin in earnest. “We hope that it
satisfies most of the views of all of the people,” he said. However, “ultimately
it falls on E.P.A. to make the call.”
The plan can be viewed at http://www.epa.gov/wtc/panel/
FAIR USE NOTICE
This article contains copyrighted material, the use of which has not always been
specifically authorized by the copyright owner. I am making such material available in my
efforts to advance understanding of democracy, economic, environmental, human rights,
political, scientific, and social justice issues, among others. I believe this constitutes
a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US
Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107,
the material in this article is distributed without profit for research and educational
Take me back to learn more