Air Today . . . Gone Tomorrow Article

Critics deride EPA’s WTC site testing
By Graham Raymon, New York Newsday, May 11, 2005

The EPA's plan to sample lower Manhattan and Brooklyn for residual dust from the World Trade Center disaster was derided Wednesday by critics who say it falls far short of what is needed.

Officials at the Environmental Protection Agency said Wednesday that the new sampling plan, which was released Tuesday night, takes in a larger area than one in 2002. They also said it could lead to more extensive testing.

But local environmental groups and elected officials criticized the plan.

"Unfortunately, it appears at first glance that the EPA's long-awaited plan has been designed in a way that is fundamentally inadequate to determine the true extent of WTC dust contamination," said Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-Manhattan).

Under the plan, dust samples will be taken in 150 buildings out of the 6,000 in Manhattan south of Houston Street and in portions of Brooklyn. Where WTC contaminants are found, a cleanup will be offered, the EPA said.

"It i! s a high-priority exercise," said EPA spokesman Michael Brown. "We've invested thousands of person hours in assuring that the health of those living in lower Manhattan and Brooklyn is not jeopardized. We have no presupposition about the results."

The data that is collected will also be used to determine whether a more extensive assessment of buildings should be done, the EPA said. An initial pot of $7 million has been set aside for the effort.

But Kimberly Flynn, of 9/11 Environmental Action, said the plan limits cleanup in less accessible areas, like ventilation systems, and does not order testing for lead on soft surfaces like carpets and upholstery.

Flynn and other critics also said a system of averaging the amount of contaminants might lead to fewer buildings being cleaned. And the plan requires discovery of a WTC "signature" in the dust, which also could limit cleaning.

"I would say that the plan confirms our worst fears and then some," she said! , adding that nearly four years after the attack there was still an urgent need to determine if contaminants exist.

Brown said less accessible areas are part of the study, and averaging "can only lead to more units being cleaned, not fewer."

David Newman, a member of a panel that will review the plan when its presented on May 24, said the question of downtown contamination remains important because there has never been a comprehensive testing effort.

"This is the only major chemical spill in the United States in the past several decades that has never been evaluated for types and extent of contamination," said Newman, of the New York Committee for Occupational Safety and Health.,0,3227417.story?coll=nyc-manheadlines-brooklyn

This article contains copyrighted material, the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. I am making such material available in my efforts to advance understanding of democracy, economic, environmental, human rights, political, scientific, and social justice issues, among others. I believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material in this article is distributed without profit for research and educational purposes.

Take me back to learn more