|
Air Today . . . Gone Tomorrow Article
Critics hit LMDC for lax
Plan to deal with Deadly Dust
By Adam Hutton, AMNewYork,
January 26, 2005
Rep. Jerrold Nadler yesterday called the Lower Manhattan Development Corporation
"irresponsible" for the way it is handling the demolition of the Deutsche Bank
building that filled with toxic World Trade Center dust on 9/11.
New tests have found dangerous levels of contaminants in the building at 130 Liberty
Street, including asbestos concentration 100 times greater than the threshold for health
risks.
Cleanup crews hired by the LMDC have found toxins in parts of the building that were not
tested before. The demolition plan submitted by the corporation last month to the
Environmental Protection Agency did not address dangerous chemicals such as asbestos, lead
and dioxins that are still trapped in enclosed spaces, such as ventilation ducts and
wiring shafts.
The corporation released the results of the new tests at a public meeting Monday night
attended by more than 100 local residents and environmental safety and health advocates.
LMDC vice president Amy Peterson told the group that the plan would have to be adjusted to
take the new information into account.
But Peterson told amNewYork yesterday that the LMDC would not resubmit the modified plan
to environmental and public safety agencies for approval.
"Thats terribly irresponsible," Nadler, a Democrat, told amNewYork.
"The LMDC should not be cutting corners by modifying the plan without resubmitting
it. And the EPA should insist that they resubmit the plan based on all the information the
LMDC has, otherwise the public cant rely on the plan to keep them safe."
Peterson said taking time to make the necessary changes to the plan should not be
considered a delay, but rather the due course of developing a good plan.
She said that although the corporation had hoped to begin tearing down the building this
month, contractors wont start the work until the EPA and other regulatory agencies
make recommendations about how to improve the plan.
Thats the way it should be, said Dr. Marc Wilkenfeld, of the Columbia University
Medical Centers Environmental Health and Safety Department "Nothing should
happen until we have an iron-clad plan in place that will protect peoples
health."
Wilkenfeld, a sub-contractor to the LMDC on the project and a member of the EPAs WTC
Expert Technical Review Panel, told amNewYork "What we should shoot for is tearing
down this building in a way that no worker or community resident is exposed to any
contamination that even approaches dangerous levels."
Peterson said that the LMDC has been applying "aggressive timelines" to the
project to remove the 9/11 relic sooner rather than later. "This has been hanging
over lower Manhattan for three years now," Peterson told amNewYork. "Its
time."
But Dave Newman, a member of the EPAs review panel, told amNewYork, "The LMDC
has been too hasty in its push for demolition before it has an adequate and complete
plan."
Newman, an expert with the New York Committee for Occupational Safety and Health, said
"the environmental sampling results shared with the public for the first time Monday
indicate a need to amend the plan to take into account contamination in ventilation
systems and other enclosed spaces, like those between interior and exterior walls."
Residents afraid for their health criticized the corporation for not taking their concerns
seriously enough. Others said the LMDC needed to improve its emergency action plan to
ensure that all residents and workers in the area are notified if contaminants are
released into the air.
"The LMDC is in over its head," said Kimberly Flynn of 9/11 Environmental
Action. "The public must be treated as a capable, reliable ally in the design phase
of this project."
http//www.nynewsday.com/other/special/amny/ FAIR USE NOTICE
This article contains copyrighted material, the use of which has not always been
specifically authorized by the copyright owner. I am making such material available in my
efforts to advance understanding of democracy, economic, environmental, human rights,
political, scientific, and social justice issues, among others. I believe this constitutes
a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US
Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107,
the material in this article is distributed without profit for research and educational
purposes. Take me back to learn more |
|
|