Air Today . . . Gone Tomorrow Article|
E.P.A.s 9/11 leader
By Ronda Kaysen, Downtown Express,
Volume 17 Issue 24 | Nov. 5 - Nov. 12, 2004
Change for the Clinton-Bush panel unveiled the day after the election
Paul Gilman, chairperson of the E.P.A. World Trade Center Expert Technical Panel will
resign at the end of the month to the surprise of many and relief of some.
Gilman, also the assistant administrator for research and development for the
Environmental Protection Agency, will leave the agency on Nov. 30, according to Michael
Brown, a spokesperson for the E.P.A. As head of the panel, Gilman steered 16 government
and independent experts in devising recommendations for the E.P.A. to measure the
environmental impact of the World Trade Center disaster.
The panel was well received by community leaders who had criticized the agencys
initial response to 9/11 and its subsequent program to clean and test Downtown apartments
for asbestos. Gilman and his colleagues indicated in July that they were moving to
institute a new testing program that included apartments, offices, firehouses and schools
south of Houston St. opposed to the first program, which only included apartments up to
Canal St. At the time Gilman told Downtown Express that it would cost about $12,000 per
unit and no more than $9.6 million in total.
The program was called a step in the right direction by many E.P.A. critics, but the
agency has not yet approved the plan and advocates are beginning to step up the pressure
to have it implemented.
Although some saw Gilmans departure as a blow, U.S. Rep. Jerrold Nadler said he is
not so sure.
"Im hopeful with a new chairman maybe we can get the panel to do what its
supposed to do," said Nadler, who called for the creation of the panel a year ago
with Senator Hilary Clinton. The panel, he said, has "dragged its feet." Nadler
said either Gilman was responsible for moving slowly or "maybe he was under orders
not to do anything." He recalled the E.P.A.s initial deception to the public
regarding W.T.C. air quality.
Last week, prior to Gilmans quiet resignation, Senator Clinton called on the Bush
administration "to take immediate action and implement a comprehensive testing and
cleanup program," according to a press release.
"The panels work is not complete, but I have received assurances from E.P.A.
that the panel will continue uninterrupted after Dr. Gilmans departure,"
Senator Clinton said in a statement e-mailed to Downtown Express. Clinton, who got the
E.P.A. to create the panel by holding up the Senate confirmation of E.P.A. administrator
Michael Leavitt last year, added that "the panel has made progress" during
Brown of the E.P.A. insists the panel and the E.P.A. have been responsive,
working on schedule and will continue to do so. "The work of the WTC expert panel is
precisely where it should be. Its where Senator Clinton and the White House counsel
designed it to be," he said. "Its a scientific process. Its not like
a Judy Garland movie. It must be designed to rigorous standards." The E.P.A., he
said, will implement the sampling plan when it is finalized. Currently, a draft of the
plan is available for public comment.
The nature of Gilmans departure raised eyebrows among community members. "I was
shocked," said Micki Siegel de Hernandez, the alternate community liaison to the
E.P.A panel. She spoke with Gilman on the afternoon of Nov. 3 hours after he announced
his resignation to his staff and he made no mention of his impending departure. His
omission, more than his departure itself, struck de Hernandez as odd. She speculated that
perhaps he did not want the changing of the guards to affect the panels work.
Catherine McVay Hughes, the panels community liaison, sees Gilmans departure
as a setback. "It will be a loss for the panel," she said. "Dr. Gilman led
the panel in the right direction, but there is still room for a lot of improvement in the
sampling program and related cleanup." Under Gilmans watch, the panel has been
responsive and supportive to community concern, said Hughes. Whether that will continue
with a new leader, remains to be seen.
"Is this going to lead us to the E.P.A. taking proper action or is this going to lead
us to have to make a dramatic regrouping?" said Kimberly Flynn, member of 9/11
Environmental Action. Gilman and the panel, she said, were generally responsive to
community concerns, although the results that come back each month from the E.P.A. often
do not reflect what have been discussed and agreed upon at the previous months
meeting. "We have two kinds of experiences with the panel. A lot of the panelists
agree with the community at the meetings," she said. "In between meetings,
ground that the community feels it has gained washes out."
One E.P.A. critic, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, suggested that Gilmans
departure the day after President Bush was reelected might have political motivations.
Either Gilman left because it became evident to him that the E.P.A., under the current
administration, would never implement the panels recommendations or he left because
the revised parameters of the plan no longer represented the initial intentions of the
Brown said that Gilman waited until after the election to leave so it wouldnt be
characterized as political. "In the vein of the Godfather, he was made an
offer that was too good to refuse in September," said Brown. Gilman decided,
"The timing would be better if he waited until after the election. He didnt
want others to characterize it as something other than it is," said Brown.
Nadler agrees with the E.P.A. on this much, at least. "A political motivation would
be if he left a day before the election," he said.
Gilman will lead "a new consortium of major research universities," said Brown.
Whoever replaces him will continue the spirit of the panel. Nevertheless,
"theres only one Paul Gilman," he said.
Gilman is expected to lead the next public hearing of the E.P.A. expert panel scheduled
for Nov. 15 from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. at St. Johns University at Murray and West Sts.
For more information, call 800-803-2833 or go to www.E.P.A.gov/wtc/panel.
All rights reserved. Downtown Express
FAIR USE NOTICE
This article contains copyrighted material, the use of which has not always been
specifically authorized by the copyright owner. I am making such material available in my
efforts to advance understanding of democracy, economic, environmental, human rights,
political, scientific, and social justice issues, among others. I believe this constitutes
a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US
Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107,
the material in this article is distributed without profit for research and educational
Take me back to learn more