Air Today . . . Gone Tomorrow Article|
Furor over WTC Lies
By Sam Smith, New York Post, July 18, 2004
Robert Gulack returned to work downtown
after 9/11 because federal officials said it was safe to go back. He woke up two days
later choking with asthma.
Now, after a blistering memo from an Environmental Protection Agency scientist claiming
the city and the EPA withheld data showing the area was actually clogged with asbestos,
Gulack is fuming and demanding reparations.
"If these allegations are true, it confirms how reckless the EPA was during this
period," he said. "There has to be some kind of compensation. People have been
horribly hurt, including innocent children."
Gulack, 50, of Fair Lawn, N.J., a plaintiff in a class-action suit against the EPA, was
joined by a chorus of lawyers, federal lawmakers and city officials scrambling to either
bolster or discredit the EPA memo.
The memo, distributed within the agency Thursday and reported by The Post Friday, claims
the city Department of Environmental Protection, in coordination with the EPA, withheld
from the public results from 17 air tests.
"None of this is surprising," said Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-Manhattan). "I've
been saying the EPA and the city are lying through their teeth about this for years."
"These are serious charges, and New Yorkers deserve a full and immediate response
from the administration," said Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, who recently established
a review panel to look at the EPA's work post-9/11.
Attorneys representing cases brought by sick workers and residents say the allegations
could have a monetary impact on their litigation. "This could support a claim for
increased punitive damages," said Jeanne Markey, an attorney in the class-action suit
against the EPA. The federal agency says the allegations raised in the memo are
"unfounded and absurd."
"The agency had one goal," said spokeswoman Mary Mears, "to see if there
was a pattern of consistently high levels of asbestos. EPA's public statements were based
on this data, which showed relatively infrequent exceedance."
Mears also says the memo is in error claiming "overloaded" test results many
of which, the memo says, were not reported mean the filters were so clogged with
asbestos, they couldn't be read. It means, according to Mears, the filter was clogged, but
not necessarily with asbestos.
The city DEP, meanwhile, admitted it did not post some data on its Web site because they
were gathered prior to the establishment of 20 sites routinely tested and reported online.
It also said the agency had found two examples so far of inaccuracies in the data reported
online that were consistent with the memo's accusations. "But to say all this adds up
to a grand scheme to conceal information is just false," said the DEP's Charles
Sturcken. "We regularly reported exceedances. We never hid that."
Copyright 2003 NYP Holdings, Inc. All rights reserved
FAIR USE NOTICE
This article contains copyrighted material, the use of which has not always been
specifically authorized by the copyright owner. I am making such material available in my
efforts to advance understanding of democracy, economic, environmental, human rights,
political, scientific, and social justice issues, among others. I believe this constitutes
a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US
Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107,
the material in this article is distributed without profit for research and educational
Take me back to learn more