Air Today . . . Gone Tomorrow Article|
Cloud hangs over Ground
By Miriam Hill, Philadephia Inquirer
Staff Writer, October 14, 2003
NEW YORK - There are nights when David Rapp wakes up gasping for air. His days are largely
confined to watching television in a small room in his family's Queens apartment. Just
walking up a flight of stairs leaves the former construction worker out of breath.
"I don't want to live like this," he said. "I can't stand this."
Rapp, 42, has not been able to work since April 2002, when the dizziness, shortness of
breath and itchy rashes he had been experiencing for months forced him off the job. He
believes the five months he spent working at the site of the World Trade Center, exposed
to dust and smoke from the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, damaged his lungs so badly that
they take in only half as much air as they used to.
More than two years after the trade center was leveled, thousands of New Yorkers have
continuing health problems that they - and their doctors - say are related to exposure to
the fire and dust they encountered near ground zero.
New York is only beginning to study whether the attacks damaged residents' physical health
as badly as it did their psyches. The questions are especially acute for rescue and
cleanup workers who inhaled caustic smoke from fires that smoldered into early 2002.
Residents of Lower Manhattan also worry that dust from the collapse may have left their
homes too unsafe to inhabit.
A federal government report in late August that said the Environmental Protection Agency
had falsely reassured New Yorkers that it was safe to return to Lower Manhattan just after
the attacks has only aggravated those fears. Documents released Thursday in connection
with that report show the discussions between the EPA and the White House over what to
tell the public about air quality in Lower Manhattan were heated.
"I think it was a public-health failure in many respects," Robin Herbert said of
the EPA's efforts. Herbert is codirector of the World Trade Center Worker and Volunteer
Medical Screening Program at Mount Sinai Medical Center in New York, where Rapp is being
Scientists from the EPA and universities collected thousands of air and dust samples in
the days and weeks after the attacks, but they disagree on what conclusions can be drawn
from that research. They also disagree about whether the EPA had done enough testing
before it told residents the week after the attacks that it was safe to return to Lower
What they do agree on is that the medical evidence points to significant health problems
caused by inhaling smoke and dust. Mount Sinai Medical Center says it has treated
thousands of patients for symptoms ranging from coughs to severe bronchitis and asthma and
even lung damage. Doctors there and at other hospitals worry these symptoms may be only
the harbinger of more serious future illnesses, such as cancer.
"People who were down there particularly on Sept. 11, and even more so, people who
were down there when the towers collapsed, were exposed to a toxic soup of
chemicals," Mount Sinai's Herbert said.
Of 3,500 ground zero workers seen at Mount Sinai, half still experience health problems,
including coughing, asthma attacks when exposed to what had been minor irritants such as
smoke, and mental-health problems. The respiratory symptoms signal a disease called
Reactive Airways Dysfunction Syndrome, or RADS.
No one knows what the long-term effects will be, including whether exposures will cause
emphysema or cancer, Herbert said.
"Our hope is that what we're seeing won't turn into longer latency diseases that take
15 to 20 years to appear," she said. "The bottom line is we really just don't
Trying to get its arms around the problem, the city has established a registry for people
exposed to the dust and smoke of 9/11 and intends to track their health over several
David Rapp helped shore up the wall that kept river water from flowing into the trade
center site. He volunteered there for two weeks immediately after 9/11 and then returned
as a paid worker in November. By January, he experienced trouble breathing. Medical
personnel at ground zero gave him oxygen. He felt better and returned to work because it
required four men.
"It's not safe for the team with only three, so I went back," he said.
He tells his story matter-of-factly. He's grateful for the help he has received, including
gifts from charities and help with rent from the Federal Emergency Management Agency. He
lives on $400 a week in workers' compensation, plus income from his wife's catering job.
He takes about 12 medications, mostly to help him breathe. When he goes out, he carries an
oxygen tank, just in case.
"I'm fighting," Rapp said. "I'm not going to let it beat me."
Doctors and scientists believe the towers collapsed so rapidly that they were pulverized
into particles small enough to penetrate the lungs. These tiny pieces of concrete and
glass were highly caustic, and when mixed with fine sulfuric acid from the smoldering
pile, burned people's airways and caused RADS.
"The lung's defenses are compromised at exactly the time when the nose, throat and
lung are being assaulted with this very fine, caustic dust," said Thomas Cahill, a
professor emeritus of physics and atmospheric science at the University of California at
Cahill tested the air around the trade center after 9/11 and found it filled with
dangerous particles. But because hot air rises, the particles cleared the area quickly, he
said. As a result, he believes recovery workers were at much greater risk than residents
and others in Lower Manhattan.
Even so, residents worry that exposure to dust that landed in their apartments may be
harmful. Some dust samples contained asbestos, which has been linked to cancer.
The EPA has tested or cleaned more than 4,000 homes, but some people who live near the
site fear their apartments have not been cleaned thoroughly.
EPA spokeswoman Mary Mears said she was confident her agency had responded appropriately
to the thousands of requests for testing and cleaning.
"We believe our cleaning was effective," she said. Only a small number of
residents whose homes the EPA cleaned have complained, she added.
An atmosphere of distrust pervades Lower Manhattan on these issues. The EPA never did
widespread testing of indoor dust and air, a step some scientists said was necessary.
Testing and cleanup of offices were voluntary, so many people who work in Lower Manhattan
do not know whether they were exposed or continue to be exposed to dangerous chemicals.
The safety and health issues have been simmering for two years but exploded into national
controversy in late August when the EPA inspector general, an internal agency watchdog,
concluded that EPA Administrator Christine Whitman lacked adequate scientific evidence
when she told the public on Sept. 18, 2001, that the air downtown was "safe to
The inspector general, Nikki L. Tinsley, also said the White House Office of Environmental
Quality had influenced the EPA to leave out statements that included guidance for cleaning
indoor spaces and cautious statements about the potential health effects from trade center
James Connaughton, who heads that White House office, disagreed with the inspector
general's characterizations of his office's actions.
"There was no such thing as the White House directing EPA to do things," he
said. "There was discussion and consensus around what we knew and what we could say
The EPA and the city communicated with Lower Manhattan residents directly in meetings and
in cleaning information sent to homes.
But the inspector general's report continues to stir controversy. Sen. Hillary Rodham
Clinton (D., N.Y.) and Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D., N.Y.) are fighting Senate confirmation of
Utah Gov. Michael O. Leavitt as head of the EPA until Congress investigates the EPA's
actions after the attacks.
Marjorie Clarke, an adjunct professor at Hunter College who has a background in
incinerator emissions, and others believe the federal government intentionally misled
"From the very beginning they just wanted to tell the world, tell the country, tell
New Yorkers, everything is OK," she said.
FAIR USE NOTICE
This article contains copyrighted material, the use of which has not always been
specifically authorized by the copyright owner. I am making such material
available in my efforts to advance understanding of democracy, economic,
environmental, human rights, political, scientific, and social justice issues,
among others. I believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted
material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance
with Title 17 U.S.C. Section
107, the material in this article is distributed without profit for research
and educational purposes.
Take me back to learn more