|
Air Today . . . Gone Tomorrow Article Feds brush off FDNY plea
for toxic cleanup
By Greg Gittrich, Daily News Staff
Writer, March 12, 2003
Federal environmental officials are refusing to scrub potentially toxic dust out of
firehouses near Ground Zero - saying they agreed to clean up only apartments, not
workplaces. The city firefighters union said the Environmental Protection Agency has
repeatedly turned down requests to clean four firehouses south of Canal St.
"Firefighters should be entitled to the same protections that the EPA has afforded
everyone who lives in lower Manhattan," said Philip McArdle, Uniformed Firefighters
Association health and safety officer. But a top EPA official would not reconsider the
policy when confronted yesterday by Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-Manhattan).
"We have not undertaken any cleanup of firehouses," said Kathleen Callahan, an
EPA assistant regional administrator. "The program that we have is strictly
residential and therefore, we would not do firehouses," she said yesterday at an
environmental forum at Fordham University.
The EPA agreed in May to scrub apartments possibly tainted with asbestos from the
collapsed twin towers - after the agency was besieged with complaints from politicians and
downtowners.
An EPA spokeswoman said that of the roughly 2,000 homes tested by the EPA, 19 showed
excessive levels of asbestos, which can cause chronic lung disease and cancer. The extent
of the overall contamination is still unknown, the spokeswoman said. The EPA program is
funded by the Federal Emergency Management Agency.
"It's about saving money and passing the buck," said Nadler, who said he
believes the EPA may be worried that cleaning the firehouses could obligate them to clean
other workplaces.
McCardle said firefighters have attempted to do the cleaning themselves, although they
have no training for the job. FDNY spokesman David Billig said checks of air quality in
the firehouses slightly more than a year ago showed it did not pose a health threat.
FAIR USE NOTICE
This article contains copyrighted material, the use of which has not always been
specifically authorized by the copyright owner. I am making such material
available in my efforts to advance understanding of democracy, economic,
environmental, human rights, political, scientific, and social justice issues,
among others. I believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted
material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance
with Title 17 U.S.C. Section
107, the material in this article is distributed without profit for research
and educational purposes. Take me back to learn more |
|
|