Air Today . . . Gone Tomorrow Article|
Congressman: OSHA's 9/11
Response Endangered Workers
By James L Nash,
Occupational Hazards, September 30, 2002
In the face of mounting evidence of long-term illness among those who did rescue and
recovery work at the former World Trade Center (WTC), the congressman representing Lower
Manhattan has criticized the response of OSHA and EPA to last year's terrorist attacks.
In a June 3 letter to OSHA Administrator John Henshaw, Rep. Jerrold Nadler, D-NY,
requested detailed information explaining why OSHA suspended its enforcement authority at
the WTC disaster site. Henshaw's Aug. 9 reply appears not to have resolved the issue. In
addition, the OSHA administrator's letter provoked new charges of EPA duplicity from
Nadler's office. Henshaw explained that "the urgency of the task" at the WTC
"did not allow time to invoke OSHA's ordinary enforcement procedures to assure the
safety of these workers."
OSHA officials have defended the decision not to enforce safety and health rules by noting
that contested citations can take years to settle, whereas the partnership agreements used
at Ground Zero led to immediate resolutions of safety issues. They also point to the low
injury rate at the site as proof the emphasis on consultation and compliance assistance
"I am sure there is no suggestion on your part," Henshaw wrote in his reply to
Nadler, "that the decision to place an emphasis on assistance somehow added to the
danger those heroic workers encountered."
That is precisely what Nadler is suggesting, according to spokesperson Eric Schmeltzer.
"The Congressman's contention is that there should have been enforcement,"
Schmeltzer explained. "He believes the suspension of OSHA enforcement authority in
favor of the contractors did put America's heroes in unnecessary danger."
Schmeltzer emphasized that Nadler was placing no blame on the contractors, as they can
only operate with the information given them by the government. Recent studies by Johns
Hopkins University's School of Public Health, the Center for Disease Control and other
institutions have documented persistent respiratory symptoms among rescue and recovery
workers, many of whom did not use proper respiratory equipment while working at Ground
Jonathan Bennett, public affairs director at the New York Committee for Occupational
Safety and Health said his organization was troubled by a number of features of Henshaw's
response to Nadler. "The Nadler letter asks for some very specific information, to
document and explain why OSHA suspended its enforcement authority," Bennett said.
"Henshaw didn't answer the question - what he wrote was a bunch of
Nadler has been even more critical of EPA's reaction to the terrorist attacks,
specifically statements that the air in Lower Manhattan was safe and EPA's refusal to take
charge of cleaning up the interior of Lower Manhattan buildings contaminated with a
variety of contaminants.
EPA has defended its decision by arguing that it had no legal responsibility to clean up
interior environments because the National Contingency Plan (NCP) was not in effect. In
his letter, Henshaw defended OSHA's consultation role at the WTC be referring to OSHA's
membership in the NCP. "OSHA is now saying NCP is in effect, a point Rep. Nadler has
been contending all along in the face of EPA denials," said Schmeltzer.
EPA declined to respond to numerous requests for comment on whether NCP was in effect.
FAIR USE NOTICE
This article contains copyrighted material, the use of which has not always been
specifically authorized by the copyright owner. I am making such material
available in my efforts to advance understanding of democracy, economic,
environmental, human rights, political, scientific, and social justice issues,
among others. I believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted
material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance
with Title 17 U.S.C. Section
107, the material in this article is distributed without profit for research
and educational purposes.
Take me back to learn more